Rhode Island Sues Meta Over Profiting From Fraudulent Ads

A Lawsuit Against Fraud
Rhode Island has filed a lawsuit against Meta, becoming the first U.S. state to officially accuse the tech giant of intentionally running fraudulent advertisements on its platforms and profiting from them. According to the complaint filed in Providence County Superior Court, Meta is violating consumer protection laws while publicly claiming that platform safety is its priority.
State Attorney General Peter Neronha stated that Meta was aware of content that posed a risk to users but continued to generate massive revenue from these scam schemes. The lawsuit relies on internal documentation suggesting that Meta displayed approximately 15 billion high-risk advertisements to users daily. Projections indicate that 10% of the company's 2024 revenue—amounting to roughly $16 billion—is derived from the promotion of fraudulent or prohibited goods.
How AI Facilitates Scams
One of the most serious allegations concerns Meta's AI-driven advertising tools. The lawsuit claims these systems sometimes actively assist scammers. Furthermore, rather than blocking suspicious advertisers, the company allegedly charges them higher fees. The complaint notes that blocked advertisers can return to the platform within seconds simply by using a new email address or phone number.
The court filing includes specific examples. One advertisement promised users a cure for Alzheimer's disease within 45 days, appearing in Meta's ad library in over 2,000 different versions. In other instances, scammers posed as Bank of America executives to lure users into fake investment schemes via WhatsApp.
Demands and the Company's Position
Rhode Island authorities are asking the court to require Meta to compensate users for damages, disgorge profits made from fraudulent ads, and pay fines for each violation. The state is also requesting the appointment of an independent monitor to oversee how the company combats fraudulent content.
For its part, Meta denies the allegations. Company spokesperson Andy Stone stated that they actively fight fraud because users do not want such content on the platform. Despite these claims, legal pressure on the company is mounting; in April, the Consumer Federation of America filed a similar lawsuit in Washington. For users worldwide who actively engage with Facebook and Instagram, this case serves as a significant reminder that advertisements on social networks often do not reflect reality and can lead to financial harm.